Dispute Over Feature Priority

This blog article was generated by 🤖 AI using prompts crafted by our mentors.

This article may contain details that are factually incorrect, and is a current work-in-progress on the Tome.gg Library. These articles are undergoing content development review by the Tome.gg content team in collaboration with mentors, leaders, and educators.

Contributing - Have a question or want to talk about this topic? Want to contribute or give your insights about it? Provide feedback to our content team by discussing this article by linking this page on our Discord channel: The Workshop > The Garage.


  • Disputes Over Feature Priority arise when there's disagreement about the order in which features should be developed and released in a software project.

  • This could delay the project and cause tension between team members, particularly when priorities are influenced by different stakeholders (users, business teams, etc.).


  • Define Clear Criteria: Establish clear criteria for prioritizing features, considering factors like user value, business impact, technical complexity, dependencies, and regulatory requirements.

  • Stakeholder Communication: Regularly communicate with all stakeholders to understand their needs and concerns.

  • Use Prioritization Frameworks: Consider using established frameworks, such as MoSCoW (Must have, Should have, Could have, and Won't have) or RICE (Reach, Impact, Confidence, and Effort) for objective decision-making.

  • Iterative Approach: Adopt an iterative approach like Agile to reassess and adjust feature priority as the project progresses.

Effective Use

A software engineer effectively handles a Dispute Over Feature Priority by establishing clear criteria for feature prioritization, maintaining open communication with all stakeholders, and employing a recognized prioritization framework. An iterative development approach is used to constantly reassess and realign priorities based on new information or changes in the project.


Ignoring the dispute, allowing influential stakeholders to dictate priorities without a balanced discussion, or deciding based on personal biases can lead to ineffective solutions. Sticking rigidly to an initial plan without accommodating project changes can also be counterproductive.


  • None yet.

Last updated