Tome.gg Library
Tome.gg
  • Tome.gg Library
  • Onboarding
    • Self-directed learning
      • Junior Software Engineer
      • Mid- to Senior-level Software Engineer
    • Accelerated learning
      • Junior Software Engineer
      • Mid- to Senior-level Software Engineer
  • Fundamentals
    • Reading, Writing, Discourse
  • Contexts
    • Overview
    • Problems
      • How do I manage a change in levels of formality on my apprenticeship?
      • Monolith vs. Microservice
      • Office Bullies
      • On Developing Motivation
      • Building Confidence
      • All Work and No Play
      • Handling disappointment and frustration
    • Scenarios
      • Offering Guidance Without Context
      • Code Review Disagreements
      • Misunderstandings and Unreliable Communications
      • Unrealistic Deadlines
      • Conflicting Coding Practices
      • Receiving Feedback on Performance Reviews
      • Bias in Task Distribution
      • Disagreements Over Tech Stack Choices
      • Dispute Over Feature Priority
      • Exclusion from Important Meetings
      • Lack of Recognition for Work
      • Dealing with Unconstructive Criticism
      • Resolving Conflict Over Deadline Disputes
      • Overcoming Conflict over Technical Debt
      • Addressing Discrimination or Harassment
      • Documentation Disputes
      • Managing Remote Work Discrepancies
      • Navigating Design Disagreements
      • Handling Security Concerns
      • Addressing Culture Fit Problems
      • Resolving Intellectual Property Disputes
  • Resources
    • Roadmap
  • EXTRAS
    • Frequently Asked Questions
      • Is Tome.gg coaching and mentoring for me?
      • Tome.gg Overview
    • Roadmap
    • Contributing Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Problem
  • Recommendations
  • Effective Use
  • Misuse
  • References

Was this helpful?

  1. Contexts
  2. Scenarios

Receiving Feedback on Performance Reviews

PreviousConflicting Coding PracticesNextBias in Task Distribution

Last updated 1 year ago

Was this helpful?

This blog article was generated by 🤖 AI using prompts crafted by our mentors.

This article may contain details that are factually incorrect, and is a current work-in-progress on the Tome.gg Library. These articles are undergoing content development review by the Tome.gg content team in collaboration with mentors, leaders, and educators.

Contributing - Have a question or want to talk about this topic? Want to contribute or give your insights about it? Provide feedback to our content team by discussing this article by linking this page on our Discord channel: .

Problem

  • A Performance Review issue arises when, during a review, a manager criticizes an engineer's work without providing specific examples or constructive feedback.

  • This lack of effective feedback makes it hard for the engineer to understand what they did wrong or how to improve, leading to frustration, confusion, and potential impacts on job satisfaction and performance.

Recommendations

  • Seek Clarification: Request specific examples and more detailed feedback to gain a clearer understanding of the criticism.

  • Constructive Dialogue: Encourage a two-way conversation during the review. Discuss your achievements, challenges, and where you see room for improvement.

  • Self-Evaluation: Regularly self-evaluate and document your work performance. This can provide a basis for discussion during the review.

  • Feedback Training: If this is a recurring issue, propose feedback training for managers to help them provide more effective, constructive reviews.

Effective Use

A software engineer successfully navigates a Performance Review issue by seeking clarification and specifics on any criticisms received. They ensure the dialogue is two-way, discussing their self-perceived performance alongside the manager's feedback. If the problem is systemic, they might suggest feedback training sessions for the managerial staff.

Misuse

Dismissing the feedback outright or responding defensively can escalate tensions and harm the professional relationship with the manager. Similarly, not seeking clarification or failing to engage in the review process constructively can prolong the issue.

References

  • None yet.

The Workshop > The Garage